August Hubbard: The issue that pops into my head immediately: gay marriage. Neoconservatives want to impose their stupid, trailer park trash morals on everyone else. That is what seperates them from the libertarians.
Mark Hovanes: Gays have a right to be as miserable as everyone else isGay Divorce will be even more contested as they determinewhich " daddy " moves out of the house ?which " mommy " gets the adopted kid ?which " mommies " and " which " daddies " pay alimony ?...Show more
Blair Abdi: @DM: Good :)
Donte Liversedge: Abomo Nation
Devon Kalberer: For itBecause I like keeping my nose out of other peoples business and a gay person getting married has absolutely no impact on me
Laveta Fathy: Gay marriage will ruin the sanctity of Kim Kardashian's 72 day marriage.
Joaquin Dronko: For. I can not think of an argument against it that does not rely on religion.
Freeman Rutkin: Nothing good. People say that gays have no choice i! n being gay, so it should be allowed. Well, what about pedophiles? According to studies, pedophiles don't chose to be that way, they are born that way. Does that mean pedophilia is right? No, of course not. But allowing gays to marry is just another step closer to that.
Samara Siewers: this concept is personal to me because one of my close friends can not accept the fact that I am straight. If thinks were reversed straight people would be feeling the same way gays do right now
Rayford Latz: As soon as gays turn straight and normal, they can get married. Until then, they just have to show their respect for the Obama White House by flipping the bird at all the portraits because. Go ahead, embarrass Obama more! Sexual deviance is gross and not to be honored.
Sonya Volcko: I believe gays should enjoy the same rights and responsibilities as all citizens. Including the right of consenting adults to choose their spouse.I'm for it.
Hong Hunkin: It doesn't co! nfuse me at all.
Lupe Sancen: Who said it was evil or sh! ady? It certainly not worth it to release capital via tax cuts only for it to go overaseas. Better spent on us by the government.
Willetta Munhall: It does not, I find it is more self professed Libertarians on YA that cannot grasp that concept.They also seem to over generalize, and are mistaken as to others beliefs.Asking questions about the "Liberals", is a tell. How many Liberals are currently in The Federal Government.........................I am against drug use, but it should not be illegal.I am not in favor of abortion, but once again it is a personal choice....Show more
Merna Fauset: I'm not for, or against it.... Here is why; I do not believe that the government should sanction marriages. For right now the gay marriage debate is based on politics, and not issues or society. As long as the government sanctions marriages, both straight and gay, No one will be happy.
Beau Starcevic: Society will become more equal as the bigots die off. We will realis! e it was all a fuss about nothing. Bigots will find a new group to hate. Ideally American politicians will start dealing with the economy, war, deficit etc.
Kaley Lappas: for it.I believe in liberty.
Travis Colomb:
Dorine Nurre: Because they are guillible and believe if the law makes something illegal, it simply goes away. I call them the 'panty bunch,' because they're constantly getting their panties in a bunch.
Arnette Dominici: Because lots of people think that everything they're against should be illegal. They're idiots like that.
Gaston Edgcomb: Government shouldn't be involved in marriage of any sort. It should be left up to religious organizations.
Kris Bozelle: The world will be a better place
Alexander Villas: For it. First, there is no rational reason to be against it. (Religion is not a rational reason, legally or otherwise, since no church will be required to perform a gay marriage.)Second, I think that this country sh! ould celebrate two consenting adults willing to commit to loving and ca! ring for each other for the rest of their lives.Third, such marriages harm no one else's marriage....Show more
Jerrod Guilfoil: It seems to confuse EVERYONE. I can't remember anyone who was not terrified that either Rick Santorum or Mitt Romney were going to personally unilatterally outlaw abortion andcontraception and gay marriage. Could Not compute that these men were Personally against it, but had no intention of foisting that on everyone. You know why? Because liberals are so used to foisting THEIR views on everyone "for the greater good" that they automatically assume that is the way everyone else rolls too....Show more
Omar Phipps: Whatever it is: I'm against it!
Antwan Schrum:
Shaunta Paap: because they get lumped with republicans who DO want to make everything they don't like illegal
Hobert Dula: One can be against something without wanting it to be illegal, or wanting there to be legal reprecussions for it. Why does this basic concep! t confuse non-libertarians so much?
Emeline Albracht: Well you see if gays are allowed to get married it will make a mockery out of my 31 year old straight marriage, at least that is what I have been told by some people. Because lord knows straight people have not already made a mockery out of marriage...LOL!There is no non-religious reason why gays should not allowed to be married, and it makes no sense to me why gay marriage is not allowed in all 50 states. Civil Unions do not give the same rights, and they are not recognized from State to State.About the gay people who disrespected the White House by posing at the pictures of former Presidents: Those were 3 people and the Gay and Lesbian Community has condoned those actions....Show more
Clemente Schoeck: Divorce Court might get interesting.
Donnell Mollo: For it.I don't like marriage particularly, but people should be able to do what they want without the govt telling them how to do it, as long as they ! are not infringing on the rights of others.
Jacques Teri: For it ! because why is it any of our business whether to males want to get married? I mean, really. Who are we to stop them? Christ, just let them be.
Rosalia Hibler: Confused by it, because marriage is a Judeo-Chirstian ritual from the old testament which states that Homosexuality is an abomination to the Lord. I am very confused as to why Gays would wish to participate in such a ritual, considering that the Lord who consecrates it believes them to be an abomination. That said I am against all marriage. I believe that the phrase "You may now kiss the bride." is minister speak for "Welcome to Hell!"
Colby Millberg: For it, or at a minimum I'm for something of equal equivalence to marriage under law. Same benefits and all.I believe that it is immoral to tell people who they can and cannot be with, and it is wrong to say that only certain relationships are valid. All true romantic relationships require that both parties feel a mutual love for one another, and I must s! ay that of the homosexual couples I have seen, the majority have had that love, and in my mind are therefore equally valid as a heterosexual couple....Show more
Marita Stadick: the difficulty is maximum human beings do not desire their babies turning out to be up believing it incredibly is a suitable selection for a existence-kind. If homosexuality and heterosexuality are dealt with the two, than their childrens will think of that to be gay is okay. it is worry-free prejudice and lack of awareness. There are 3 MILLION gay human beings contained in united statesa. meaning there 297 MILLION HETEROSEXUALS. talk approximately homophobia. If there is something it incredibly is a decision, it has have been given to be sexual orientation. I abhor the argument that gay marriage leads is a slippery slope. they say if we enable it than adults would be marrying minors and animals. it must be an thrilling debate if a goat ought to CONSENT to marriage. yet by way of fact animals c! an not consent, i don't see the way it incredibly is even remotely clos! e to to 2 human beings, in spite of intercourse, finding out directly to commit themselves to a minimum of one yet another. If the regulation differences so as that 12 years can marry, than they could desire to permit 12 twelve months olds to drink, vote, very own weapons, combat in wars, paintings, andcontinual. there's a reason we've age limits. there is not any slippery slope....Show more
Shane Getler: Don't give a $hit about it.It is a non-issue that is only being used as a distraction to keep the drones from questioning the fact that Obama is nothing but a Bush third term, and to keep the drones from focusing on real issues like record unemployment and record poverty levels.
